Hello all,
Well done to all the presenters who were successful this afternoon with their oral presentations.
Six talks, six passes - very well done to Scott, David, Connor, Sam, Selma and Hollie.
The subjects were varied and interesting - Optic Pathology, Physics of Sport, Evolution of Technological Displays, Eye Prosthetics, Dental Radiography (my current area of expertise!) and Black Holes.
Illia, thank you so much for coming in to get a flavour of the talks and for your positive input too.
I thoroughly enjoyed the talks, your input, your research, your enthusiasm and more, excellent.
For those of you who were at the session today, I would like you to comment on how you felt the session went this afternoon:
- did it go as well as you had planned?
- what did you do well?
- could you have done better?
- did you learn something about yourself and your peers?
- what did you think about the feedback etc.?
These are just pointers for you to consider. Please feel free to namecheck anybody in particular whose talk you enjoyed.
Your comments will help next week's presenters.
How I ran the session was as follows:
Welcome to the session and the assessment, I had all the presenter's slides ready to go, the class decided on the running order (please see Connor's observations in the comments section), the presenters all delivered, with questions from me and their peers.
I advised when the 8 minutes was up as a guide to come to conclusion (5 mins is the minimum needed as per the unit descriptor, and 8 mins is the guideline for the upper limit).
Each presenter was given two feedback sheets at the start - one was to self-reflect and the other to provide objective feedback to one presentation of their choosing. I felt this worked really well.
I then provided my detailed feedback which today resulted in a full house of passes. It really was a very enriching session indeed.
Thanks in advance and well done again.
Mark